Veredito Final: Kibe Assado Perfeito em 5 Minutos
We need to produce article with HTML tags only:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No markdown. Must start with a
paragraph of contextualization. Then we must follow the editorial directives. We have product: “Receita de Kibe Assado”. Specifications: just “Kibe Assado”. Affiliate link empty. We must not use markdown formatting like ** etc. Only HTML tags. We need to produce full article with sections as per Part 1 and Part 2. Use tags accordingly. Constraints: – Use only tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No other tags like
,
,
, etc? Wait the directive says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we cannot use
,
,
, etc. However the Part 2 includes a FAQ section with
and
. Those are not allowed per the strict rule. But maybe they are part of the required output? The directive says we must write exclusively using those tags. So we cannot include
etc. But the instruction includes a requirement to render that HTML block. However the higher-level rule says we must obey the formatting rules: only those tags. So we must adapt the FAQ to use allowed tags only. Perhaps we can use
is not allowed. So we need to produce FAQ using maybe for questions and
for answers? Or use
with- for Q&A? But need to map to the required format? The directive for FAQ says “Formate a FAQ em HTML limpo:” and shows etc. But the overall rule says only allowed tags are those listed. So we must produce something that uses only allowed tags. We can maybe use
for each question and
for answer, maybe wrap in
is not allowed. So we must deviate from that exact block but still meet the requirement? The instruction says “Renderize exatamente o HTML abaixo adaptado…” but also “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: …” So there is conflict. We need to prioritize the higher-level rule: only those tags. So we cannot use,
,
. So we need to produce a FAQ using allowed tags. We can perhaps use for each question, then
for answer. Maybe separate with
? Not allowed. Could use
- but that might not be ideal. But the instruction for Part 2 includes a specific HTML block for FAQ. However the higher-level rule says we must use only certain tags. Possibly we can embed that block but it uses,
,
which are not allowed. So we must adapt. Given the instruction hierarchy: The user gave a big directive that includes “REGRAS RIGIDAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML: 1. Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we must obey that strictly. So we cannot use any other tags. Thus we must produce article using only those tags. That means we cannot use
,,,,
Ingredientes
... items ...
Modo de preparo
Passo 1: ...
Passo 2: ...
Variações e acompanhamentos
... items ...
Perguntas frequentes
Posso congelar?
...
... But we need to keep only allowed tags. We also need to include a "CARD" for "PARA QUEM É VS. PARA QUEM NÃO É". We can create a similar structure using
and. Maybe:🎯 Esta Receita é Ideal para Você?
not allowed. So we can just use and then two? Not allowed. Maybe we can use for the heading and then two
sections with bullet lists. But the instruction specifically wants that card. However the higher-level rule says only certain tags. Possibly we can embed the card using only allowed tags but still convey the same content. Let's try:
🎯 Esta Receita é Ideal para Você?
✅ ESTA RECEITA É PERFEITA SE:
- Critério positivo 1
- Critério positivo 2
- Critério positivo 3
❌ PODE NÃO SER A MELHOR OPÇÃO SE:
- Critério negativo 1
- Critério negativo 2
- Critério negativo 3
That uses allowed tags. We need to include a closing practical part with 3 tips. We must not use any other tags. We must not use markdown syntax like ** for bold? Actually is allowed. So we can use . We must not use any other formatting. We must not use any empty placeholders like [TEMA/NICHO] etc. We can fill with relevant content. We need to include a link only if we have a valid URL; we have "#", so we must omit any tag. Thus we will not include any tags. We must start with a
paragraph of contextualization. That paragraph should not be an introduction generic; must answer directly. Thus first paragraph could be something like: "
Kibe assado combina a crocância da fritura com a suculência do recheio, entregando um prato tradicional com menos óleo e mais praticidade na cozinha.
" But we must avoid generic intro. It's okay. Now produce the article. Structure: 1. Direct answer: maybe two short paragraphs. 2. Quick technical sheet: maybe a table with rows: Tempo de Preparo, Tempo de Forno, Rendimento, Dificuldade. We can use
with... ... . 3. Ingredients list. 4. Step-by-step. 5. Variations and accompaniments. 6. Story/origin. 7. FAQ. 8. Card for "para quem é vs. para quem não é". 9. Closing practical tips. We must ensure microparagraphs
| , | ,
|
|---|