Avaliação Técnica: O Segredo do Kibe Frito Explicado
We need to produce the article according to strict directives. Let’s parse requirements. User wants article in Markdown and HTML clean tags only:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No markdown formatting like headings (#), bold (**), etc. Must use only those tags. Also need to follow editorial directives: start with a
contextualizing analysis, not with a title. Must not use
. Use for headings maybe. Use microparagraphs max 3 lines. Use short sentences. Use bullet lists with- . Use for emphasis. Use
maybe for technical data? They said technical data can be in a highlighted block in markdown originally, but we must output only allowed tags. They said “Write EXCLUSIVELY using clean HTML tags:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we cannot use markdown syntax like ** or ###. Must use HTML tags only. However they also said “Write the article in Markdown and HTML clean now.” That’s contradictory. But the directives say “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Não use Markdown (* , ** , #) e nunca use a tag
.” So we must output HTML only, not markdown. So we will output HTML with those tags only. We need to include: – Opening paragraph
contextualizing the analysis technical of product before any question. Must start with a
tag. – Then likely a
for title? They said not to start with title tag. But we can include headings using. Probably we can have for sections. – Must include “FICHA TÉCNICA RÁPIDA” block. They said “Use a highlighted block in Markdown” but we must use allowed tags. Could use a
to present technical data. – Ingredients list with- . – Steps with
maybe not allowed; they didn’t list as allowed. Only allowed tags:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. So we cannot use
. We can use for steps? Could use with- for each step. That’s okay. – Must include SEO sections: History, variations, FAQ in HTML with etc. But they said we can only use allowed tags. However the FAQ format uses and
and
which are not in allowed list. But they gave an example of FAQ HTML with those tags. The directive says “Write EXCLUSIVELY using tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That seems contradictory because the FAQ example uses
,
,
. Perhaps those are allowed as part of the FAQ block? The directive says “EXCLUSIVELY using tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That suggests we cannot use
,
, etc. But they gave an example of FAQ with those tags. Maybe they expect us to use exactly that HTML structure, even though it includes and
. The instruction says “Write EXCLUSIVELY using tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” But then they gave an example with
etc. There’s conflict. Given the higher-level instruction: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Não use Markdown (* , ** , #) e nunca use a tag
.” So we must restrict to those tags only. But the FAQ block they gave uses etc. Maybe they consider those as part of allowed tags? The list does not include. So we cannot use. But the FAQ block is required to be rendered exactly as given. The instruction says “Renderize exatamente o HTML abaixo adaptado”. That includes,
,
,. So we must include those tags even though they are not in the allowed list. The allowed list might be just for main article content, but the FAQ block is explicitly defined with those tags. I’d assume we must use that exact HTML structure, including
,
,
. The allowed tags list may be incomplete; they gave an example for FAQ. So we should include that block as is. Also the Affiliate card uses
| , | ,
|
|---|