Asa de Frango Crocante: O Guia Definitivo para a Perfeição

We need to produce article following strict rules. The user gave a detailed directive. We must output HTML formatted article, starting with a

paragraph of contextualization, then continue. Must not use markdown headings, only

,

,

,
• , ,
  ,,

  ,

  , . Also must obey link rules: only 1-2 links allowed, using exact URL from [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL] which is “#”. That’s not a valid URL. Probably no link allowed because link is “#” placeholder? The spec says any link must use exactly URL in [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL]. It is “#”. That is not a proper link. Probably we cannot include any link because it’s not a valid URL? It says “Qualquer link que você criar para direcionar ao site oficial deve usar OBRIGATORIAMENTE a URL exata contida em: [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL].” Since it’s “#”, maybe we can include a link to “#”? That would be just anchor to same page, not useful. Probably we should not include any link because it’s not a valid URL. Also we can have up to 2 links, but we must not invent domains. So we can either include the “#” link or skip. Safer to skip. We must produce article about “Receita de Asa de Frango”. Must include: – Part 1: A RECEITA PERFEITA: direct answer in first 2 paragraphs, no intro generic. Then quick technical sheet in markdown? They said “Use um bloco destacado em Markdown”. But we must write only HTML tags allowed. However they said “Use a block destacado em Markdown”. But earlier they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas”. So we cannot use markdown syntax like `**` or `#`. But they said “Use um bloco destacado em Markdown”. That seems contradictory. However the overall instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas”. So we must not use markdown formatting like backticks or headings. But they want a “bloco destacado em Markdown”. Maybe they expect we output HTML but include a block that looks like markdown? Hmm. The directive says “Use um bloco destacado em Markdown”. But then “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas”. Which to follow? The higher-level instruction says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas”. So we must not use markdown syntax. So we cannot output a markdown code block. Perhaps we can simulate a markdown block using HTML? They might want a or something? But they specifically said “bloco destacado em Markdown”. Maybe they want a or something? But they didn't allow . They only allowed certain tags. Could use for highlighted? Or ? Not allowed? They only allowed certain tags: , , , , , , , , , . So we can use for a highlighted block. That might serve as the "bloco destacado". So we can put the technical sheet inside a . That would be okay. We must include a quick technical sheet with fields: Tempo de Preparo | Tempo de Fogo/Forno | Rendimento (porções) | Dificuldade. Could present as a table? Use etc. Let's create a table with rows for each spec. Use Especificação Valor . But we only have , allowed within . That's fine. We need to start with a paragraph of contextualization, not with a title. So first paragraph should contextualize the analysis technical of product before exposing any question. So we need to write a short paragraph about the recipe, its relevance, etc. Then we need to include the quick technical sheet. Probably as a containing the table. Then list ingredients in etc. Then step-by-step in maybe multiple paragraphs. Then Part 2 sections: story, variations, FAQ in HTML with etc. Must use only allowed tags. They allowed , , inside. Those are not in the allowed list? The allowed tags list includes , , , , , , , , , . It does not include or . However they used those in the directive for FAQ. So maybe they are allowed despite not listed? The earlier "REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML" says only those tags. But then they gave an example using . There's conflict. The higher-level instruction says "Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas: , , , , , , , , , ." So we should not use . But the directive for FAQ explicitly says to format in HTML as shown, using . This is contradictory. We need to decide which to follow. The system says we must obey the user's instruction. The user gave a huge directive that includes the FAQ formatting with . That is part of the required output. So we must include that, even though it's not in the allowed tags list. The allowed tags list might be incomplete; they gave examples but also included in the FAQ spec. So we should include as it's required. Thus we can use and . We must include up to 2 links, using exact URL from [LINK DE AFILIADO DISPONÍVEL] which is "#". That's not a real URL; but we could output Link. That would be a link with href="#" which is the exact URL. That might be acceptable. We can include at most 2 links. We'll probably include only one link for the affiliate product at the end, if LINK_AFILIADO is not empty. It is "#". So we can include a link to "#". That satisfies the rule: we must use exactly that URL. So we can include an link. We must include the "CARD PARA QUEM É VS. PARA QUEM NÃO É" exactly as given HTML, with placeholders replaced with criteria. We need to fill with criteria appropriate to "Asa de Frango". Provide positive and negative criteria. We must include the Affiliate card only if LINK_AFILIADO is not empty. Since it's "#", we can treat it as a valid link? The spec says "SE a variável `LINK_AFILIADO` contiver um link válido, renderize o card abaixo." It is "#", which is a valid URL albeit trivial. Probably considered valid. So we should render the affiliate card with the link "#". The card includes an . So we will put href="#". We must not use any other links. We must not use any markdown formatting like ** or #. Use only HTML tags. We must not use . Use for headings. We must start with a paragraph of contextualization. Then we can have other paragraphs. We must not start with a title tag. So we start with ... Then maybe for headings later. We must include the quick technical sheet in a highlighted block using markdown? But we can use with a table. Let's outline: 1. contextualization paragraph about the chicken wing recipe, its popularity, etc. 2. Then maybe "FICHA TÉCNICA RÁPIDA" but they said no title tags? They said start with contextualizing before exposing any question. So after that we can have other tags. We need to include the quick technical sheet as a block. Use containing a table. Example: Tempo de Preparo: 30 minutos Tempo de Fogo/Forno: 25 minutos Rendimento: 4 porções Dificuldade: Fácil But they wanted a "bloco destacado em Markdown". Using is okay. 3. Ingredients list: ... etc. 4. Steps: maybe multiple with step instructions. 5. Then story/history: maybe "ORIGEM E HISTÓRIA" then paragraph. 6. Variations: maybe "VARIAÇÕES RECOMENDADAS" then with variations. 7. FAQ: Use the structure with as shown. Must include 5-10 questions. We'll include maybe 5. 8. Card "PARA QUEM É VS. PARA QUEM NÃO É": Must render exactly the HTML given, with placeholders replaced. 9. Affiliate card: Since LINK_AFILIADO is "#", we need to render the card with href="#" and fill [TEMA/NICHO] maybe "Asa de Frango". Also [FRASE_CONVITE_OBJETIVA] we need to fill with something. We must fill the criteria placeholders in the card with actual criteria. We must not use any other links besides the one in the affiliate card (which uses "#"). We must not exceed 2 links total. The affiliate card includes one link. That's okay. We must ensure we have no other tags. Now produce final output in HTML only, no markdown. We must not use any extra commentary. Let's craft Relacionado