Mulher Livre: onde baixar curso e se é gratuito
We need to produce HTML editorial page following strict rules. Must start with
containing contextualization, then first Card Download Premium block (the one with style gradient etc). Then sections with H2 headings, each 120-250 words, using only data from provided data. Must include keywords naturally. Must include Card Final at end. Must not exceed or add extra sections beyond required. Must not add FAQs, not add conclusions, not add extra notes. Must not mention internal processing. Must use only tags allowed:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Wait the earlier instruction: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That conflicts with requirement to use
headings. The schema says use H2 for sections. But the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” says only those tags allowed. However earlier “DIRETRIZES DE ESCANEABILIDADE E MARKETING” says “Use títulos H2.” There’s conflict. The higher priority is the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” which says only those tags allowed. But also earlier “PROCESSAMENTO INTERNO” says use H2? Actually the spec: “A página deve conter obrigatoriamente os blocos abaixo. Cada seção deve possuir entre 120 e 250 palavras. Utilizar títulos H2.” So we need H2 tags. But then later “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML: 1. Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” This says only those tags allowed, no H2. There’s conflict. Which to follow? Usually the later instruction overrides earlier? The “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is more specific about allowed tags. It explicitly lists allowed tags, and says “Todo parágrafo corrido deve estar encapsulado em tags
. Não use Markdown (*, **, #) e nunca use a tag
.” It does not mention H2, but earlier sections require H2. Possibly we can use for headings? But they said use H2. Hmm. We need to reconcile: The allowed tags list does not include. It includes. So maybe we should use as heading. But the spec says “Utilizar títulos H2.” That might be a requirement that we must use. However the later rule says only those tags allowed, which includes but not. Which to prioritize? The instruction hierarchy: The “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” seems to be a strict rule: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we cannot use
. But the earlier section says “Utilizar títulos H2.” This is contradictory. In such cases, we might need to follow the most recent instruction? The “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” appears later in the prompt, maybe it overrides earlier. Also the “REGRAS DE SEO” mentions distribute keywords naturally but no heading specifics. Thus we should use for headings instead of. But the spec says “Utilizar títulos H2.” Might be a mistake. I think we should use as it’s allowed. However we need to include the section headings as required: they said “A página deve conter obrigatoriamente os blocos abaixo. Cada seção deve possuir entre 120 e 250 palavras. Utilizar títulos H2.” So we need to have sections with H2 headings. But we cannot use. Maybe we can use and still satisfy? Might be considered noncompliant. However the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is explicit about allowed tags; using would break that rule. So we must use. Let’s use for each section title. But also the “CARD DOWNLOAD PREMIUM” uses inside the card. That block includes tag. That is part of required structure; they explicitly gave HTML with. That conflicts with allowed tags as well. The card includes. So perhaps they allow inside that specific block? The allowed tags list maybe refers to overall page, but the card includes as part of its structure, so maybe it’s okay. The card uses inside the block; they gave that exact HTML. So we must include that exact card with. So we can use there. For other sections, maybe we can use as allowed. But the spec says “Utilizar títulos H2.” Might refer to sections also need H2. But the card already uses H2; maybe they want H2 for sections as well. But then allowed tags list excludes. This is contradictory. Given the card requires, we must include there. For other headings, maybe we can also use as it’s needed for sections. The allowed tags list might be a mistake; but they explicitly said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” That excludes
. Yet the card includes. So maybe they allow in that block only. Or they expect us to use for other headings but the card uses as part of its structure; that’s okay because it’s inside the card code they gave, which includes. So we can use inside that block; outside maybe we can use. But they also said “Utilizar títulos H2.” So maybe we should use for each section heading as well. But that would break allowed tags rule. Which to prioritize? The instruction hierarchy: The “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is a strict rule; but the earlier “ESTRUTURA EDITORIAL OBRIGATÓRIA” says “Utilizar títulos H2.” I’d think the later rule about allowed tags is more specific about which tags can be used, but they gave a list that excludes. Yet they also gave a block with. So maybe they intend that we can use only within that block? Hmm. Given the complexity, I think we should follow the card exactly as given (including). For the other sections, we can use headings, as that’s allowed. The spec says “Utilizar títulos H2.” but maybe they meant H2 in the card? Not sure. I’ll produce the page: – Start with
contextualization including product name, download, area de membros, acesso, plataforma. – Then Card Download Premium (exact HTML with
inside). That includes “Download e Área de Membros do [nome_produto]” and link. – Then Section 1:O Que É o [nome_produto]
with content 120-250 words. – Section 2:
Como Funciona o Download do [nome_produto]
with content. – Section 3:
Garantia, Segurança e Suporte
with content. – Section 4:
Principais Aplicações do Conteúdo
with
- …
list. – Section 5:
Para Quem o [nome_produto] É Indicado
with list. – Then Card Final (exact HTML with
“Acessar o [nome_produto]”). We must embed keywords naturally: [nome_produto] download, baixar [nome_produto], acesso ao [nome_produto], área de membros do [nome_produto], plataforma do [nome_produto], login do [nome_produto]. We need to ensure each section is 120-250 words. Let’s craft about 150 words each. We must not exceed or add extra sections. We must not add FAQs, conclusions, etc. We must not mention anything not in data. We must not invent info. We must not mention “download” as separate word? It’s okay. We must include the card blocks exactly as given, with placeholders replaced with actual product name “Mulher Livre: Dependência Emocional”? The product name is “Mulher Livre: Dependência Emocional”. But earlier they refer to [nome_produto] placeholder. Should we use the full name? Probably just the name without colon? The product name is “Mulher Livre: Dependência Emocional”. Use that exactly. In card, they have “[nome_produto]” placeholder; we replace with the product name. So inside card we put “Mulher Livre: Dependência Emocional”. Also in headings we need to include that name. But the card includesDownload e Área de Membros do [nome_produto]>. Replace with actual name. Similarly Card Final uses “[nome_produto]” placeholder. Thus we will replace all placeholders with “Mulher Livre: Dependência Emocional”. Ensure we keep colon and spacing. Now write the content. First paragraph
must include citation of
| , | ,
|
|---|
